Menu Expand
  • Hochschule für angewandtes Management GmbH
  • EN / DE
  • Login

Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices

  1. Journals
  2. Sociologus
  3. Vol. 70, Issue 1
  4. pp. 1–17

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Beek, J., Bierschenk, T. Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices. Sociologus, 70(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.70.1.1
Beek, Jan and Bierschenk, Thomas "Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices" Sociologus 70.1, , 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.70.1.1
Beek, Jan/Bierschenk, Thomas: Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices, in: Sociologus, vol. 70, iss. 1, 1-17, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.70.1.1
Format
Download

Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices

Beek, Jan | Bierschenk, Thomas

Sociologus, Vol. 70(2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–17 | First published online: April 28, 2020

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.70.1.1
Language
English
Pages
17

Pricing

Individual
€ 34.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Forum Universitatis 6, 55099 Mainz

Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Forum Universitatis 6, 55099 Mainz

Cited By

  1. When ‘street-level bureaucrats’ act as cultural brokers: The normative dilemmas and personal commitment of government officials in southern Ethiopia

    Epple, Susanne

    Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 33(2021), Iss. 4 P.348

    https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211029684 [Citations: 1]

  2. In Tandem – Pathways towards a Postcolonial Anthropology | Im Tandem – Wege zu einer postkolonialen Ethnologie

    Gemeinsames Beobachten als dekoloniale Praxis der ethnologischen Wissensgenerierung

    Dürr, Eveline

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38673-3_3 [Citations: 0]

  3. Afterword: Brokerage as social practice

    Bierschenk, Thomas

    Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 33(2021), Iss. 4 P.418

    https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211034060 [Citations: 4]

  4. Social policy as knowledge process: How its sociotechnical links to labour reconfigure the social question

    Lammer, Christof

    Global Social Policy, Vol. 24(2024), Iss. 2 P.166

    https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231210158 [Citations: 1]

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. 2008. Writing Against Culture. In T. Oakes & P. L. Price (eds.), The Cultural Geography Reader (pp. 50–60). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.  Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, L. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Towards an Investigation. In L. Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays (pp. 127–186). London: New Left Books.  Google Scholar
  3. Bachmann-Medick, D. 2006. Cultural Turns: Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag.  Google Scholar
  4. Baumann, G. 1996. Contesting Culture: Discourses of Identity in Multi-Ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  5. Beek, J., 2016. Producing Stateness: Police Work in Ghana. Leiden: Brill.  Google Scholar
  6. Beek, J., Göpfert, M., Owen, O. & Steinberg, J. (eds.). 2017. Police in Africa: The Street Level View. London: Hurst.  Google Scholar
  7. Behrends, A., Park, S.-J. & Rottenburg, R. 2014. Travelling Models: Introducing an Analytical Concept to Globalisation Studies. In A. Behrends, R. Rottenburg & S.-J. Park (eds.), Translating Technologies of Social Ordering: Travelling Models in Conflict Management (pp. 1–40). Leiden: Brill.  Google Scholar
  8. Bierschenk, T. and Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. 2014. Ethnographies of Public Services in Africa: An Emerging Research Paradigm. In T. Bierschenk and J.-P. Olivier de Sardan (eds.), States at Work: Dynamics of African Bureaucracies (pp. 35–65). Leiden: Brill.  Google Scholar
  9. Bierschenk, T. and Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. 2019. How to Study Bureaucracies Ethnographically? Critique of Anthropology 39 (2), pp. 243–257.  Google Scholar
  10. Bohannan, P. 1969. Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology. In L. Nader (ed.), Law in Culture and Society (pp. 401–418). Chicago: Aldine.  Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. 1999. Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field. In G. Steinmetz (ed.), State/Culture: State-Formation After the Cultural Turn (pp. 53–76). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Brubaker, R. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. In R. Brubaker (ed.), Ethnicity Without Groups (pp. 7–27). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Brubaker, R., Loveman, M. & Stamatov, P. 2004. Ethnicity as Cognition. In R. Brubaker (ed.), Ethnicity Without Groups (pp. 64–87). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  14. Cabot, H. 2013. The Social Aesthetics of Eligibility: NGO Aid and Indeterminacy in the Greek Asylum Process. American Ethnologist 40 (3), pp. 452–466.  Google Scholar
  15. Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E. (eds.). 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Coe, C. 2005. Dilemmas of Culture in African Schools: Youth, Nationalism, and the Transformation of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Comaroff, J. & Comaroff, J. L. 2015. Theory from the South or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  18. Deutscher Bundestag. 2019 [1949]. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. 23 May 1949 Last Amended on 28 March 2019. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag. Availabe at: >https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf> (Accessed 24 January 2020).  Google Scholar
  19. Duyvendak, J. W., Geschiere, P. & Tonkens, E. H. (eds.). 2016. The Culturalization of Citizenship: Belonging and Polarization in a Globalizing World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  20. Eriksen, T. H. 2001. Between Universalism and Relativism: A Critique of the UNESCO Concept of Culture. In J. K. Cowan, M.-B. Dembour & R. A. Wilson (eds.), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 127–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Eriksen, T. H. 2006. Diversity Versus Difference: Neo-Liberalism in the Minority Debate. In R. Rottenburg, B. Schnepel, & S. Shimada (eds.), The Making and Unmaking of Differences: Anthropological, Sociological and Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 13–25). Bielefeld: transcript.  Google Scholar
  22. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1973 [1937]. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  Google Scholar
  23. Gluckman, M. 1969. Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law. In L. Nader (ed.), Law in Culture and Society (pp. 349–373). Chicago: Aldine.  Google Scholar
  24. Gramsci, A. 1986. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. With assistance of Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith. Reprint. London: Lawrence and Wishart.  Google Scholar
  25. Griaule, M. 1975. Dieu d‘eau. Entretiens avec Ogotemmêli. Paris: Fayard.  Google Scholar
  26. Handelman, D. 1981. The Idea of Bureaucratic Organization. Social Analysis 9, pp. 5–23.  Google Scholar
  27. Hannerz, U. 1999. Reflections on Varieties of Culturespeak. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2 (3), pp. 393–407.  Google Scholar
  28. Hannerz, U. 2006. Studying Down, Up, Sideways, Through, Backwards, Forwards, Away, and at Home: Reflections on the Field Practice of an Expansive Discipline. In P. Collins & S. Coleman (eds.), Locating the Field: Space, Place, and Context in Anthropology (pp. 23–41). Oxford: Berg.  Google Scholar
  29. Herzfeld, M. 1992. The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. New York: Berg.  Google Scholar
  30. Hirschauer, S. 2017. Humandifferenzierung. Modi und Grade sozialer Zugehörigkeit. In S. Hirschauer (ed.), Un/doing Differences. Praktiken der Humandifferenzierung (pp. 29–54). Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.  Google Scholar
  31. Holmes, D. R. & Marcus, G. E. 2006. Fast Capitalism: Para-Ethnography and the Rise of the Symbolic Analyst. In M. S. Fisher & G. Downey (eds.), Frontiers of Capital: Ethnographic Reflections on the New Economy (pp. 33–57). Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  32. Islam, G. 2015. Practitioners as Theorists: Para-Ethnography and the Collaborative Study of Contemporary Organizations. Organizational Research Methods 18 (2), pp. 231–251.  Google Scholar
  33. Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering Culture: Control und Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.  Google Scholar
  34. Larsen, L. B. 2013. Moulding Knowledge into a Legal Complex: Para-Ethnography at the Swedish Tax Agency. Journal of Business Anthropology 2 (2), pp. 209–231.  Google Scholar
  35. Lentz, C. 2017. Culture: The Making, Unmaking and Remaking of an Anthropological Concept. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 142 (2), pp. 181–204.  Google Scholar
  36. Lerner, D. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press.  Google Scholar
  37. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.  Google Scholar
  38. Mead, M. 1966 [1928]. Coming of Age in Samoa: A Study of Adolescence and Sex in Primitive Societies. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.  Google Scholar
  39. Middleton, T. 2013. Scheduling Tribes: A View from inside India’s Ethnographic State. Focaal 65, pp. 13–22.  Google Scholar
  40. Monjardet, D. 1994. La culture professionnelle des policiers. Revue Française de Sociologie 35 (3), pp. 393–411.  Google Scholar
  41. Mugler, J. 2018. Regulatory Capture? Fiscal Anthropological Insights into the Heart of Contemporary Statehood. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50 (3), pp. 379–395.  Google Scholar
  42. Nading, A. 2016. Evidentiary Symbiosis: On Paraethnography in Human-Microbe Relations. Science as Culture 25 (4), pp. 560–581.  Google Scholar
  43. N’Guessan, K. 2014. The Bureaucratic Making of National Culture in North-Western Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies 52 (2), pp. 277–299.  Google Scholar
  44. Nielsen, B. 2011. UNESCO and the ‘Right’ Kind of Culture: Bureaucratic Production and Articulation. Critique of Anthropology 31 (4), pp. 273–292.  Google Scholar
  45. Nieswand, B. 2014. Über die Banalität ethnischer Differenzierungen. In B. Nieswand and H. Drotbohm (eds.), Kultur, Gesellschaft, Migration: Die reflexive Wende in der Migrationsforschung (pp. 271–296). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  46. Nieswand, B. & Drotbohm, H. 2014. Einleitung: Die reflexive Wende in der Migrationsforschung. In B. Nieswand and H. Drotbohm (eds.), Kultur, Gesellschaft, Migration: Die reflexive Wende in der Migrationsforschung (pp. 1–37). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  47. Ordonez, J. T. 2008. The State of Confusion: Reflections on Central American Asylum Seekers in the Bay Area. Ethnography 9 (1), pp. 35–60.  Google Scholar
  48. Pelican, M. 2010. Umstrittene Rechte indigener Völker: Das Beispiel der Mbororo in Nordwestkamerun. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 135 (1), pp. 39–60.  Google Scholar
  49. Reckwitz, A. 2006. Die Transformation der Kulturtheorien. Zur Entwicklung eines Theorieprogramms. Weilerswist: Velbrück.  Google Scholar
  50. Reichman, D. 2011. Migration and Paraethnography in Honduras. American Ethnologist 38 (3), pp. 548–558.  Google Scholar
  51. Rottenburg, R. 2013. Ethnologie und Kritik. In T. Bierschenk, M. Krings & C. Lentz (eds.), Ethnologie im 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 55–76). Berlin: Reimer.  Google Scholar
  52. Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.  Google Scholar
  53. Schwegler, T. & Powell, M. 2008. Unruly Experts: Methods and Forms of Collaboration in the Anthropology of Public Policy. Anthropology in Action 15 (2), pp. 1–9.  Google Scholar
  54. Sedgwick, M. W. 2017. Complicit Positioning: Anthropological Knowledge and Problems of ‘Studying Up’ for Ethnographer-Employees of Corporations. Journal of Business Anthropology 6 (1), pp. 58–88.  Google Scholar
  55. Steinmetz, G. 1999. Culture and the State. In G. Steinmetz (ed.), State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn (pp. 1–50). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.  Google Scholar
  56. Stolcke, V. 1995. Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology 36 (1), pp. 1–24.  Google Scholar
  57. Strasser, S. 2014. Post-Multikulturalismus und “repressive Autonomie”: sozialanthropologische Perspektiven zur Integrationsdebatte. In B. Nieswand and H. Drotbohm (eds.), Kultur, Gesellschaft, Migration: Die reflexive Wende in der Migrationsforschung (pp. 41–68). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, R. M. Jr. 1999. Eric R. Wolf, 76, an Iconoclastic Anthropologist. The New York Times, 10.3.1999. Available at: >https://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/10/us/eric-r-wolf-76-an-iconoclastic-anthropologist.html?module=inline> (Accessed 26 April 2019).  Google Scholar
  59. Verne, M. 2019. Ist Kultur ästhetisch? Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 182.  Google Scholar
  60. Weber, M. 1972 [1921]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  61. Wimmer, A. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  62. Wright, Susan 1998. The Politicization of ‘Culture’. Anthropology Today 14 (1), pp. 7–15.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Jan Beek / Thomas Bierschenk: Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists: The Use of Culture in State Practices 1
1. Bureaucracy and Culture 4
2. How Bureaucrats Use Culture 5
3. Bureaucrats as Para-Ethnologists 8
4. Conclusion 1
References 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2025 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Publishing Platform by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.