“Why We Must Be Wary of the Concept of Disobedience”
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
“Why We Must Be Wary of the Concept of Disobedience”
Oppositional Actions and Political Belongings
Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik, Vol. 31(2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 41–51
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Geoffroy de Lagasnerie
Abstract
“Why We Must Be Wary of the Concept of Disobedience”
If one follows the investigation of certain historical examples (The Black Panther Party, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, etc.) and the reflection of the relation between individual on the one hand and the state and law on the other, I would describe the relevance of the concept of disobedient in the characterization of the attitude to the relevant acting to what is prescribed by the law.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geoffroy de Lagasnerie: “Why We Must Be Wary of the Concept of Disobedience” | 41 | ||
| I. Disobey and Flee | 41 | ||
| II. To Face and Not to Belong | 43 | ||
| III. Subordination | 44 | ||
| IV. Pretention | 45 | ||
| V. Fiction or Performativity? | 45 | ||
| VI. Legitimism | 45 | ||
| VII. A Colonial Theory of the Law | 47 | ||
| VIII. The Law Comes from the Outside | 48 | ||
| IX. Crime | 50 | ||
| X. A Quest for Oppositionality | 51 | ||
| Zusammenfassung | 51 |