BOOK CHAPTER
Cite BOOK Chapter
Style
Format
Ulex: Open Source Law for Non-Territorial Governance
In: Was tun? Wie Freiheitsentrepreneure unser Zusammenleben revolutionieren (2025), pp. 243–258
Additional Information
Chapter Details
Pricing
Abstract
AbstractCommunities that stretch across international borders struggle to resolve their members’ disputes. It is not a trifling problem. Distributed protocols such as Ethereum, EOS, and Dash host hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and handle transactions worth millions daily. Their members likely number in the tens of millions, scattered in unknown locations across the globe. Even the most successful of these communities have fractured over questions of how to interpret, apply, and amend their rules. The resulting “governance by hardfork” has generated skepticism about all things crypto -from currencies, to economics, to governments. Distributed protocols need a comprehensive, trustworthy, independent set of rules for resolving disputes. Ilex, an open source legal system, offers a solution. Its substantive and procedural rules can resolve the disputes of communities stretching across international borders. Its flag-free rules, drawn from tested and trusted private and non-governmental sources, define a wide range of legal claims and the procedures to follow in resolving them. This paper explains how Ilex can upgrade the governance of distributed protocol communities, describes current efforts on that front, and paints an attractive future of open source, non-territorial law.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tom W. Bell: Ulex: Open Source Law for Non-Territorial Governance | 243 | ||
| I. Introduction: Distributed Governance Needs Non-Territorial Law | 243 | ||
| II. Current Efforts to Implement Ulex: The Open Source Legal System | 245 | ||
| III. Ulex Plugin | 246 | ||
| 1. EOS, Decred, and other distributed protocol communities. | 247 | ||
| 2. Kleros | 247 | ||
| 3. OpenBazaar | 248 | ||
| IV. Model Contract Clauses Within Ulex | 249 | ||
| V. Ulex and the Needs of Non-Territorial Communities | 252 | ||
| VI. Conclusion: Future Law for Non-Territorial Communities | 254 | ||
| References | 255 |