Juristische Logik, Rationalität und Irrationalität im Recht / Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law
BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Arnaud, A., Hilpinen, R., Wróblewski, J. (Eds.) (1985). Juristische Logik, Rationalität und Irrationalität im Recht / Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law. Vorwort von / Preface by Roberto J. Vernengo. Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45866-0
Arnaud, André-Jean; Hilpinen, Risto and Wróblewski, Jerzy. Juristische Logik, Rationalität und Irrationalität im Recht / Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law: Vorwort von / Preface by Roberto J. Vernengo. Duncker & Humblot, 1985. Book. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45866-0
Arnaud, A, Hilpinen, R, Wróblewski, J (eds.) (1985): Juristische Logik, Rationalität und Irrationalität im Recht / Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law: Vorwort von / Preface by Roberto J. Vernengo, Duncker & Humblot, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45866-0
Format
Juristische Logik, Rationalität und Irrationalität im Recht / Juristic Logic, Rationality and Irrationality in Law
Vorwort von / Preface by Roberto J. Vernengo
Editors: Arnaud, André-Jean | Hilpinen, Risto | Wróblewski, Jerzy
Rechtstheorie. Beihefte, Vol. 8
(1985)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vorwort | V | ||
| I. | V | ||
| II. | IX | ||
| III. | XII | ||
| Inhaltsverzeichnis | XV | ||
| I. Logik im Dienste des Rechts | 1 | ||
| Jean-Louis Gardies, Nantes: LOGIQUE FORMELLE ET RAISONNEMENT JURIDIQUE | 3 | ||
| I. | 3 | ||
| II. | 5 | ||
| III. | 11 | ||
| IV. | 19 | ||
| Helmut Schreiner, Salzburg: FORMAL LOGIC AND LEGAL REASONING | 21 | ||
| I. Preliminary Remarks | 21 | ||
| II. The Appropriate Formalism | 22 | ||
| III. The Ought Constructed as an Operator in a Statement | 23 | ||
| IV. Further Conditions of Adequacy | 24 | ||
| V. Prerequisites for a Technic-Mechanical Employment | 25 | ||
| Martin P. Golding, Durham (U.S.A.): AESTHETICS AND LEGAL REASONING: A STRAND IN AMERICAN LEGAL THOUGHT | 31 | ||
| Svend Gram Jensen, Copenhagen: ROSS ON LIBERTY | 39 | ||
| Viktor Knapp, Prag: ZWISCHENBEZIEHUNGEN IN DER JURISTISCHEN LOGIK | 43 | ||
| I. Juristische Logik | 43 | ||
| II. Aussagen und Sollsätze | 44 | ||
| III. Verschiedene Arten von Modallogik im Rechtsdenken und ihre Zusammenhänge | 45 | ||
| IV. Zusammenhänge und Zwischenverbindungen | 47 | ||
| Antonio A. Martino, Firenze (Italy): TRENDS IN THE APPLICATION OF LOGIC TO THE AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION | 53 | ||
| Albert Menne, Bochum: MEHRWERTIGE LOGIK IM JURISTISCHEN DENKEN | 61 | ||
| René Sève, Paris: UNE FORMALISATION DU LIBÉRALISME JURIDIQUE | 69 | ||
| Lennart Åqvist, Uppsala: ON THE LOGICAL SYNTAX OR LINGUISTIC DEEP STRUCTURE OF CERTAIN CRIME DESCRIPTIONS: PROLEGOMENA TO THE DOCTRINE OF CRIMINAL INTENT | 77 | ||
| I. Introduction | 77 | ||
| II. Types of Crime Versus Concrete Criminal Acts | 78 | ||
| III. Two Preliminary Definitions of Maltreatment and a Type-Determination | 79 | ||
| IV. Problems and Further Definitions | 80 | ||
| VI. Crimes Qua Concrete Acts | 83 | ||
| VII. The Theoretical Connection between the Concepts of Crime-Type and Concrete Act; the Linking Problem | 84 | ||
| VIII. Three Fresh Definitions of “Quinternary” Maltreatment | 85 | ||
| IX. Comments on D2.2–D2.4 | 86 | ||
| II. Grundlagen und Grenzen der Rationalität im Rechtsdenken | 89 | ||
| Victor Arèvalo Menchaca, Basel: DIE EGOLOGISCHE THEORIE UND IHRE RECHTSONTOLOGIE | 91 | ||
| Abraham Edel, Philadelphia: LIMITS UNDER A NON-RATIONALISTIC RATIONALITY | 101 | ||
| Martin D. Farrell, Buenos Aires: PRACTICAL REASONING AND JUDICIAL DECISION | 109 | ||
| I. Introduction | 109 | ||
| II. Analysis of Practical Reasoning | 109 | ||
| III. Aarnio’s Theory | 117 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 121 | ||
| Åke Frändberg, Uppsala: SOME ASPECTS ON RATIONALITY IN LEGISLATION | 123 | ||
| I. | 123 | ||
| II. | 126 | ||
| III. | 127 | ||
| IV. | 129 | ||
| V. | 132 | ||
| VI. | 134 | ||
| VII. | 135 | ||
| VIII. | 137 | ||
| Zygmunt Ziembiński, Poznań: TWO CONCEPTS OF RATIONALITY IN LEGISLATION | 139 | ||
| I. | 139 | ||
| II. | 144 | ||
| III. | 147 | ||
| IV. | 150 | ||
| Ulrich Lohmann, Berlin (West)/München: SYSTEMATIK, METHODE UND INTENTION DER SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN UND DER RECHTSWISSENSCHAFT | 151 | ||
| I. Problemaufriß | 151 | ||
| II. Systematik | 152 | ||
| III. Methode | 153 | ||
| IV. Intention | 156 | ||
| V. Rechtswissenschaft als Sozialwissenschaft | 158 | ||
| Neil MacCormick, Edinburgh: THE LIMITS OF RATIONALITY IN LEGAL REASONING | 161 | ||
| I. Introduction | 161 | ||
| II. Observations on Practical Rationality | 162 | ||
| III. Legal Reasoning and the Limits of Rationality | 173 | ||
| Ralf Dreier, Göttingen: IRRATIONALISMUS IN DER RECHTSWISSENSCHAFT | 179 | ||
| I. Zum Begriff des Irrationalismus | 179 | ||
| II. Juristischer Irrationalismus | 184 | ||
| III. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen juridischer Rationalität | 189 | ||
| Enrico Pattaro, Bologna: NO VALUES FROM RATIONALITY | 197 | ||
| I. Rules and Responsibility | 197 | ||
| II. Ethics and Reason | 198 | ||
| III. Universalisation, Theories, and Logical Inferences. Is There a Justification for their Use in Ethics like in Science? | 199 | ||
| David A. J. Richards, New York: LEGAL INTERPRETATION AND RATIONALITY | 203 | ||
| Nikolas Roos, Maastricht: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE SOCIAL FUNCTION OF LEGAL LANGUAGE | 213 | ||
| I. The “Problem” of Lay Adjudication | 213 | ||
| II. Weber’s Views Concerning Lay Adjudication in Modern Law | 214 | ||
| III. The Empirical Merits of Weber’s View Concerning Lay Judges | 215 | ||
| IV. A Revision of Weber’s Theory of the Social Function of Legal Rationality | 219 | ||
| V. Some Implications of the Revision | 222 | ||
| András Sajó, Budapest: TECHNOCRATIC FALLACIES AND THE SO-CALLED LEGISLATIVE RATIONALITY | 223 | ||
| Leon Shaskolsky Sheleff, Tel Aviv: IRRATIONALITY IN LAW AND SOCIETY. A Critique of Weber’s Sociology of Law | 231 | ||
| François Terré, Paris: DÉFINIR LE DROIT? | 247 | ||
| I. | 247 | ||
| II. | 249 | ||
| III. | 252 | ||
| H. Ph. Visser’t Hooft, Utrecht: ON LIMITS OF RATIONALITY: SOME TERMINOLOGICAL REMARKS | 255 | ||
| Robert Weimar, Siegen: DIE REKONSTRUKTION VON RECHTSVERNUNFT | 259 | ||
| I. Konstruktion oder Rekonstruktion? | 259 | ||
| II. Das halbierte Praxisverständnis | 259 | ||
| III. Rechtsvernunft durch kritische Argumentation? | 260 | ||
| IV. Rechtsvernunft – politische Fähigkeit oder oberster Grundwert? | 261 | ||
| V. Ungewißheit und Unvollständigkeit der Rechtsvernunft | 263 | ||
| VI. Rechtsvernunft als Wertungsrationalität? | 264 | ||
| Erich Zalten, Basel: DIE RATIONALEN METHODEN DER SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN UND DAS PROBLEM DER GRENZEN DES RATIONALISMUS ANGESICHTS DER NORMATIVEN HUMANITÄT | 267 | ||
| I. Vorbemerkung zum Verständnis meiner Ausführungen | 267 | ||
| II. Zu den „rationalen Methoden“ in den Sozialwissenschaften | 268 | ||
| III. Zum philosophischen Problem der Grenzen des Rationalismus | 273 | ||
| IV. Zur „Abklärung“ der Humanität als Norm okzidentaler Kultur | 276 | ||
| Marek Zirk-Sadowski, Łódź: RATIONALITY OF LEGAL AXIOLOGY | 279 | ||
| III. Menschenrechte, Bürgerrechte und ziviler Ungehorsam | 289 | ||
| Michael D. Bayles, Gainesville (Florida): COURTS VS. LEGISLATURES AS PROTECTORS OF HUMAN RIGHTS | 291 | ||
| I. Human Rights | 291 | ||
| II. International Protection | 296 | ||
| III. National Protection | 298 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 303 | ||
| Joseph Ellin, Kalamazoo, Michigan: THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUALS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF LIBERALISM | 305 | ||
| V. E. Gulyev, Moscow: ABOUT THE HUMAN RIGHTS’ SOCIAL IMPORTANCE | 319 | ||
| John Kleinig, Sydney: PATERNALISM AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY | 323 | ||
| Thomas Laker, Göttingen: ZIVILER UNGEHORSAM UND BUNDESDEUTSCHES VERFASSUNGSRECHT | 333 | ||
| I. Widerstandsrecht und ziviler Ungehorsam | 334 | ||
| II. Begriff und Relevanz des zivilen Ungehorsams | 336 | ||
| III. Verfassungsrechtlicher Status | 339 | ||
| 1. Die Wechselwirkungslehre des Bundesverfassungsgerichts | 339 | ||
| 2. Das Pätsch-Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofes | 340 | ||
| 3. Konsequenzen | 341 | ||
| Adam Łopatka, Warsaw: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM | 347 | ||
| B. J. Narain, Belfast: ABSOLUTISM VS. RELATIVISM IN SOCIAL AND LEGAL PHILOSOPHY: HUMAN RIGHTS | 351 | ||
| Boris Nazarov, Geneva: LEGAL RELATIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RIGHTS | 357 | ||
| Conclusions | 365 | ||
| Jordan J. Paust, Houston, Texas: THE INCORPORATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTO DOMESTIC LAW | 367 | ||
| Rolando Tamayo, México: THE FUNCTIONING OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM | 375 | ||
| I. The Problem | 375 | ||
| II. Right as Permission | 376 | ||
| III. Absence of Constraint and Rights | 376 | ||
| IV. The Right and the Source Thesis | 378 | ||
| V. Rights and their Protective Perimeter | 379 | ||
| VI. Facultas Exigendi | 381 | ||
| VII. The Prima Facie Character of Rights | 382 | ||
| VIII. Rights and Adjudication | 384 | ||
| Knut Erik Tranøy, Oslo: CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. A Question of Law and/or Morality? | 387 | ||
| Lars D. Eriksson, Helsinki: ON MORAL JUSTIFICATION OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE | 397 | ||
| Personenregister | 407 | ||
| Verzeichnis der Mitarbeiter (einschl. des Beirats der Herausgeber) | 413 | ||
| Beiträge des 11. Weltkongresses für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Gesamtverzeichnis | 417 | ||
| 1. Verlag Duncker & Humblot: Beihefte von RECHTSTHEORIE, 1985 | 417 | ||
| 2. Verlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH: Beihefte von Archiv für Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie, 1985 | 418 | ||
| 3. D. Reidel Publishing Company: Law and Philosophy Library, 1985 | 419 |