Menu Expand
  • Hochschule für angewandtes Management GmbH
  • EN / DE
  • Login

Official History in Eastern Europe

Cite BOOK

Style

Amacher, K., Portnov, A., Serhiienko, V. (Eds.) (2021). Official History in Eastern Europe. fibre. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-88640-433-9
Amacher, Korine; Portnov, Andrii and Serhiienko, Viktoriia. Official History in Eastern Europe. fibre, 2021. Book. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-88640-433-9
Amacher, K, Portnov, A, Serhiienko, V (eds.) (2021): Official History in Eastern Europe, fibre, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-88640-433-9

Format

Official History in Eastern Europe

Editors: Amacher, Korine | Portnov, Andrii | Serhiienko, Viktoriia

Einzelveröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts Warschau, Vol. 40

(2021)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

Unter »Official History« wird eine staatlich geförderte und ideologisch motivierte Auslegung der Vergangenheit verstanden, die politischen Zielen meist nicht-demokratischer Regime dient. Der optimistische Glaube, dies würde mit dem Zerfall der Sowjetunion ein Ende nehmen, stellte sich als naiv heraus. Pierre Nora behauptete, dass in den letzten 30 Jahren eine »allgemeine Politisierung von Geschichte« - die Ideologisierung der Arbeit von HistorikerInnen - beobachtet werden konnte.

Wie wird die Arbeit von HistorikerInnen heute von den langjährigen Erfahrungen des 20. Jahrhunderts in Osteuropa beeinflusst? Was könnte eine »offizielle Geschichte« für staatenlose Nationen oder selbsternannte »Republiken« bedeuten? Wie wurde die ukrainische Geschichtswissenschaft sowjetisch oder ihr die Sowjetisierung auferzwungen? Welche Räume für individuelle Forschungsinitiativen oder sogar minimalsten Dissens mit den vorgeschriebenen Forschungsplänen wurden in den offiziellen Geschichtsinstitutionen der Sowjetunion und des sozialistischen Polens geboten? Wie wurden russische Geschichtsbücher in der postsowjetischen Zeit umgeschrieben? Welche Rolle spielen Literatur, Film, Denkmäler, Tourismus oder Rituale in der Geschichtspolitik? Wie wurde das Gedächtnis an den Zweiten Weltkrieg im gegenwärtigen russisch-ukrainischen Konflikt instrumentalisiert und wie beeinflussen die Bilder des Krieges im Donbas die geschichtspolitischen Debatten in benachbarten postsowjetischen Staaten?

Diesen Fragen wird in den interdisziplinären Beiträgen dieses Bandes von ForscherInnen aus Österreich, Frankreich, Deutschland, Großbritannien, Litauen, Polen, der Schweiz und der Ukraine nachgegangen. Der Großteil der Artikel entstand im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes »Divided Memories, Shared Memories. Ukraine/Russia/Poland (20th-21st centuries): An Entangled History« (gefördert durch den Schweizerischen Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung) an der Universität Genf und wurde erstmals im Juni 2018 auf der Konferenz »Official History in Eastern Europe. Transregional Perspectives« am Deutschen Historischen Institut in Warschau präsentiert.
»Official history« is generally understood as state-sponsored and ideologically inclined construction of the past which serves certain political aims of mostly non-democratic regimes. The optimistic believes that it will end up with the collapse of the Soviet Union proved to be rather naive. As Pierre Nora argued, over the last thirty years we have experienced a »general politicization of history« - the process of transforming what historians produce into an ideology.

How are the intellectual choices made by historians today influenced by the long twentieth-century experiences of Eastern Europe? What could »official history« mean for a stateless nation or a self-proclaimed »republic«? How did Ukrainian historiography become or how was it forced to become Soviet? What spaces for individual research initiatives or even for modest disagreement with obligatory planned research existed in the official history institutions of Soviet Ukraine and socialist Poland? How were Russian textbooks on history re-written during the post-Soviet years? What role do literature, film, monuments, holidays or rituals play in the politics of history? How have memories of the Second World War been instrumentalised in the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian conflict and how have images of the ongoing war in the Donbas influenced memory debates in neighbouring post-Soviet states?

All those questions are reflected in the interdisciplinary contributions to the volume by scholars from Austria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Lithuania, Poland, Switzerland and Ukraine. The majority of research papers were developed within the research project Divided Memories, Shared Memories. Ukraine/Russia/Poland (20th-21st centuries): An Entangled History (supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation) at the University of Geneva, and were first presented at the conference Official History in Eastern Europe. Transregional Perspectives at the German Historical Institute Warsaw in June 2018.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Table of Contents 5
Introduction 9
Constructing Official Histories: Institutions and Personalities 13
Viktoriia Serhiienko: ‘Official History’ for a Stateless Nation. Mykhaǐlo Hrushevs’kyǐ’s Illustrated History of Ukraine 15
Hrushevs’kyǐ’s Idea and its Competitors 16
The Art Collector Who Publishes History Books 21
The IHU and the Russian–Ukrainian Historical Debate 26
Kyïvan Rus’ and Prince Volodymyr 26
Hetman Bohdan Khmel’nyts’kyǐ and his Uprising 28
The Figure of Hetman Ivan Mazepa 31
Hrushevs’kyǐ Among Friendly Critics and Grateful Readers 33
Andrii Portnov: How History Writing Became ‘Official’. Soviet Ukrainian Historiography Reconsidered 39
The Collectivization of the Academy of Sciences 40
The Institute of the History of Ukraine 43
Another Academic Tradition and Its Limitations 48
The Soviet University in Ukraine 50
The Higher Attestation Commission and the Granting of Academic Degrees 53
The Singularity of Ukraine in the Soviet Historiography of the 1960s–1980s 56
The Social Status of the Historian and the Non-Conformist Arena 57
The Challenges of Perestroika 61
Éric Aunoble: “To Reflect the History of the Party as It Was”. The Ukrainian Branch of the Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute in Critical Times (1945–1949) 65
A Ukrainian Soviet Post-War Institution 67
The Soviet Organization of Work 69
The Historians’ Method 70
Historiographical Debates 73
Publications and Activities 74
Career Strategies 77
The Individual’s Role in Historiography 79
Estelle Bunout: Embedded Revisions? Past Relations with Eastern Europe at the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) (1947–1965) 87
Establishing a New Norm on the History of Polish Foreign Relations After 1948 88
Embedded Revisions: A Cautious Opening of the Polish Eastern Question (1959) 93
The Tribulations of Stanisław Zabiełło on the Discussion of the Eastern Border of Poland (1950–64) 98
Embedded Revisions: Three Paths Towards a New Discourseon Polish Relations with Eastern Europe 102
Korine Amacher: History Textbooks in Russia (1992–2019). Between Multisided and Imperial Perspectives 105
I. From Pluralism to a Single View? Russian History Textbooks (1992–2019) 107
From the Single History Book of the Soviet Period to the Freedom for History Textbooks in the 1990s 107
The Slow Return of the State’s Firm Hand (2000–16) 111
A Smaller Market, But No Single Textbook 114
II. Imperial Model(s) (1992–2019) 118
The Russian Empire in Post-Soviet Textbooks (1992–2015) 118
A United Multi-Ethnic Russian State (2016–19) 124
The USSR’s Protective Hand 128
Conclusion 131
Literature as a History’s Playground 133
Miriam Kruse: Martyrs, Traitors, Healing Housewives. The Representation of Female War Experiences in Boris Gorbatov’s Taras’ Family (1943) 135
Gender Roles in Soviet Politics and Culture Before, During, and After the War 136
Close Reading: Gender Roles and Female Images in Taras’ Family 140
Nastia 141
Lizka / Luisa 143
Antonina 146
Conclusions 148
Oleksandr Zabirko: The War in Neverland. The History of Novorossiia as Literary Project 151
1. 151
2. 154
3. 159
4. 163
5. 165
6. 170
(Re-)Inventing Memorial Spaces 171
Tatiana Zhurzhenko: The Monumental Commemoration of St. Volodymyr / St. Vladimir in Ukraine, Russia, and Beyond. The Nationalization of the Past, the Orthodox Church, and ‘Monumental Propaganda’ Before and After the Annexation of Crimea 173
Introduction 173
1. Understanding the New Monumental Cult of St. Vladimir / St. Volodymyr 175
1.1. Re-Bordering Russia and Ukraine 176
1.2. Local Memory Politics, Diverse Mnemonic Actors 178
1.3. Between the Public and the Sacred: Making Use of Monuments to St. Vladimir / St. Volodymyr 180
2. The Proliferation of Monuments to St. Vladimir / St. Volodymyr 186
2.1. St. Volodymyr in Kyïv (1853) 186
2.2. The Millennium of the Christianization of Rus’ in 1988 188
2.3. The Collapse of the USSR and the Proliferation of Statues of St. Vladimir in Russia 192
2.4. Monuments to St. Volodymyr in Post-Soviet Ukraine (1991–2013) 200
2.5. The Annexation of Crimea and the Russian–Ukrainian Conflict 207
Conclusion 216
Paul Zalewski / Oleksandra Provozin: Construction and Destruction. How St. George’s Square in L’viv Became a Battlefield 219
The History of St. George’s Square: A Brief Overview 220
The Monument Competition (and the Chronology of the Dispute) 221
Conclusions 230
Živilė Mikailienė: Memory Culture and Memory Politics in Lithuania (1990–2018). The Case of Lukiškės Square in Vilnius 237
Lukiškės Square as a lieu de mémoire 241
The Problem of Creating a Historical Narrative in the First Decade After Independence 244
Lukiškės Square – Only Urban or Memorial Space? 246
Lukiškės Square Issues in the Context of the Millennium Celebrations of the State of Lithuania 248
Battles for Memory 252
Some Conclusions 261
The Euromaidan, the Donbas War, and Its Trans-Border Dimensions 265
Alexandr Osipian: World War II Memory Politics in Russia and Ukraine and Their Uses During the Conflict in the Donbas (Spring–Summer 2014) 267
Competing War Memories in Post-Communist Europe 269
From Controversies to Memory Wars 271
‘The Great Patriotic War’ Reinterpreted and Instrumentalized as Russia’s Primary Myth and Instrument of Soft Power Abroad 273
Competing Narratives of the Second World War in Ukrainian Politics 275
Inventing the ‘Ukrainian Fascist’ Threat, Drawing the Dividing Lines, Performing the Battles 278
From Memory War to Proxy War: WWII Performed During the Military Conflict in the Donbas 282
Conclusions 288
Felix Ackermann: History as a Means of Hybrid Warfare? The Impact of the Ongoing War in Eastern Ukraine on Historical and Political Discussions in Lithuania 291
The Public Representation of State-Driven Public History 292
The European Neighbourhood Policy on Trial 295
Euromaidan from a Lithuanian Perspective 297
Lithuanian Reactions to the War in Eastern Ukraine 298
Changing Public Debates and the Transformation of Memory Politics 299
Totalitarianism and the Ideology of the Double Genocide 303
Holocaust Debates as Part of Hybrid Warfare? 307
Conclusion: The Heightening and Relativizationof Historical Arguments 316
Ursula Woolley: The Securitization of Entangled Historical Identity? Local and National History Discourses in Dnipro During the Poroshenko Presidency 319
Introduction 319
Local Actors and Public History Initiatives 322
Four Major Public History Initiatives 327
A Common Historical Narrative: National-Local Intersubjectivity 333
Historical Politics: Focuses of Dispute 336
Competing Modifications of Key Historical Tropes 340
Conclusion 345
List of Contributors 349
Index of Persons 355